Link Pruning is the Key to Addressing Penguin | Perficient Digital

Link Pruning is the Key to Addressing Penguin

As you probably know, Google’s recent Penguin update focused on lowering rankings for sites that use questionable link building practices.

This is a hot topic! If you have been hit by Penguin, or are worried about future variations of the algorithm, this is a video you can’t miss. In fact, regardless of your current situation, pruning the worst links out of your profile is a rock solid idea.

Key Points

  1. Link pruning refers to the identification and removal of unnatural, non-organic, or generally spammy links from a link profile.
  2. In many cases, questionable link building tactics (buying links, spamming links) can result in an eventual loss of rankings.
  3. In the event of a loss of rankings (or warning from Google) due to unnatural link profiles, it sometimes makes sense to investigate a link profile, find the low quality links, and send requests to their webmasters for removal.
  4. Many times, getting a link removed from a webmaster can be as difficult, if not more difficult, then getting the link in the first place.
  5. The key to this process is persistence and communication with Google.
  6. Sometimes, the best you can do is send a list of the links you are trying to remove, and ask Google to discount them. Showing an effort to Google is always a good plan of action.
  7. When removing links, don’t expect to return to your pre-penalty rankings. You must replace the spammy links that were detected with quality links, which can sometimes be a lengthy process.
  8. Link pruning should be considered every month. Ask yourself: What is the bottom 5 percent of links that I have in terms of quality? How can I remove these and replace them with quality links?

Full Interview Transcript

Eric Enge: Hi, I’m Eric Enge of Perficient Digital. I’m here today with Bruce Clay. Bruce, take this moment and tell us a little bit about yourself.

Bruce Clay: Bruce Clay has been in business since 1996. We started out as a pure play SEO company. We’ve now expanded into other areas of internet marketing optimization. We do SEO, PPC, analytics. We’re Omniture-certified, as an example. We do conversion rate optimization, social media, and a lot of design architecture work.

Bruce Clay Website

We are probably well-known for speaking at conferences. We wrote the Wiley book Search Engine Optimization All-In-One for Dummies. We do a lot of courses. I sponsor a lot of conferences, the Search Engine Strategies and Search Marketing Expo. I think I’m either notable there for being a speaker, a teacher, an exhibitor, a sponsor.

I think most people remember me because I provide drink tickets.

Eric Enge: That’s an important benefit that you bring to attendees.

Bruce Clay: Yes. So, I think networking is important. So, we’re pretty well-established, I think, in the industry and we hope to continue to, obviously, grow within that space.

Eric Enge: Yes, super. So, Bruce, you and I chatted a little bit offline here about this notion of link pruning. And, you know, what we’re really talking about here is a site that may or may not have gotten the problem in terms of being flagged by Google. But they know they have a problem in terms of their link profile. Too many links from unrelated sources, or purchased, or whatever they might be. Can you talk a little bit about how you think about link pruning?

Webmaster Unnatural Links Notice

Bruce Clay: Yes. We started doing what we call link pruning. It wasn’t really; it’s still not a mainstream term, but it really does apply to what we do.

Perhaps six, eight months ago, we had a client at one point that was very, very well-ranked, but they felt that links were; they bought into the Kool-Aid, if you will. They understood that links were important, and they thought it was important and they talked to us and we’ve always been a firm that attracts links instead of recruiting links, if you will. We don’t buy them. We don’t do that.

So, really, about a year and a half; two years ago, they bought into that concept. Somebody sold them the bill of goods. They had been with us for a while, so they said, “Oh, new eyes. Let’s try this.” They went out and that person immediately started buying links and spamming links. Blog links. All sorts of really spammy kinds of things.

They took their rankings, which were significant, and they lost them all. They came back to us and then all of sudden we’ve got a site that we were familiar with, on page looked good, but off page was absolutely a disaster. And we felt by the evaluation that what they had done was burned their trust scores.

So, what had happened is their PageRank had gone up and their trust had gone down. They found themselves nowhere in the first three, four, or five pages of ranking. It was time to do a repair.

And in the world of finance, there are two ways to make money. You either sell more or you spend less. Because the difference is where you’re at. And as any good numerator/denominator system seems to be, in this particular case, the biggest bang for the buck was actually in removing the bad links instead of trying to overcome them with more good links.

Eric Enge: Right.

Bruce Clay: So, we invented this term called link pruning, and in the link pruning process what we do is we attempt to determine the quality of the sites that actually link to you. We started by subscribing to Majestic SEO. We used their ACRank score to determine the probable lower match kind of things.

And then we manually went into all of the lowest-scored pages and we determined whether or not they were organic or inorganic inbound links. And where we determined that they were off-topic or spammy or low-quality blog links or things that looked like they had been acquired instead of earned.

We solicited either a no-follow or removal of the link themselves. That turned out to be a rather lengthy process. For anybody that has ever tried to, “Dear Webmaster, please link to me,” getting rid of links is twice as bad.

Eric Enge: Yes, exactly. Even if you paid for it originally, they don’t want to spend the time to take it off.

Bruce Clay: Yes, because it’s going away. I mean, they make no money if you do that. They’re in no hurry to do that. In some of the cases, we found that even though, through this link network they bought into, they were paying for the links, even when they stopped paying for the link, the link didn’t go away. So, the penalty remained because the link was still there. They stopped paying for it, but that didn’t eliminate it.

Eric Enge: So, how do you deal with that problem, then?

Bruce Clay: Well, you have to be somewhat persistent. You have to request in writing a couple of times. If you can determine who it was that did it through this network, sometimes going to them, they have more juice with those individual sites than you ever would. So, you know, we would attempt to determine where the originator of the link request came from and work through them as an intermediary.

The problem you also face (and we ran into this) is some of them knew they were junk sites. And this is something really bizarre because I didn’t expect it. When they knew that they were a junk site, as soon as we requested that they remove the link, they sent us an email saying, “We will remove your links for $10 a link.” Almost as if they put the link in knowing that eventually you would have to ask them to remove and it and that would be how they would make their money.

Eric Enge: Yes.

Bruce Clay: I think it’s kind of hard to tell. When things like that happen, you know, there’s only one thing you do is you take that email and you forward it off to Google. Because it’s a good reason why I can’t get rid of my links.

Eric Enge: Right. Well, and that, I think, is a big part of the strategy, right? Because at the end of the day you can’t get all your links removed. It’s not gonna happen. So, what we’ve seen work is you create a Google Doc, you send in a reconsideration request, you point to the Google Doc, and say, “Hey, I tried to get these removed. I couldn’t. Please just discount them.”

Bruce Clay: Yes. And, quite frankly, Google hasn’t; again, there’s no ruler for measuring how many I have to get rid of. It’s a subjective kind of a thing. In some cases, they say that you have demonstrated, on a good-faith basis, that you are removing them, continue to remove them, let us know later. In some cases, you’re demonstrating it, you’ve done a good enough job, we’ll let you back in.

The belief is that if Google actually penalizes you for these bad links, unfortunately, this is a customer belief, that if I was ranked on page 3, I buy the links, I move up to page 1. I get penalized to page 5. We remove the links, you move back up to page 3. The customer is generally upset because they didn’t move back up to page 1.

Well, the only reason you were on page 1 is because you were pre-spam. But we have customers that were upset because, “Hey, I really enjoyed being there. I asked you to fix my links and you haven’t gotten me back to page 1.” Which is two entirely different situations. Sometimes getting back to where you were before the bought the links is all you can really expect.

Eric Enge: Right. So, we won’t have time for it in today’s video, but obviously, then, that says that the next thing you do is you work on building good quality organic links to get you back there. But at least by having gone through this process will have taken the problem out of the mix.

Bruce Clay: Well, we hope. As an ongoing thing, by the way, there’s maintenance to this. I mean, every month you should say: What is my 5 percent worst links, how do I prune that 5 percent and add in 5 percent at the top? How do I churn my link network to have a generally better quality?

Link Pruning Illustrated

Because, believe me, Google’s gonna keep turning that dial. It’s gonna tighten down and what made it through last month may not make it through this month. So, the surprise of Google.

Eric Enge: Awesome. Well, great talk, Bruce. I enjoyed it a lot. Thanks very much.

Bruce Clay: Thank you.

Contact Us

Uncertain about which services will best address your business challenge? Let our digital marketing experts help.


13 responses to “Link Pruning is the Key to Addressing Penguin”

  1. Tasha in San Jose says:

    Regarding point #8:
    “How can I remove these and replace them with quality links? ”
    If you can replace them, then those new links would not be QUALITY links, would they?
    I thought a “quality” link is NOT one that you can influence directly (such as a blog comment, or guest post, or article link, or a directory, or a paid link).
    A quality link is, as far as I understand, when you wake up one morning and look through your link reports and discover that the NY Times has out-of-the-blue linked to your website for no reason at all except for the fact that your site has great content on it.

  2. Eric Enge says:

    Hi Tasha – Actually it is OK to go market your site, and there are many ways to market your site without buying links or doing spammy things to get links. For example, doing a press release of something noteworthy, giving an interview to a local paper, writing a great article and getting a major website to publish it. These are just a few examples of things which are perfectly valid strategies for link building.
    Google wants you to get links which are freely given, not paid for, bartered or stolen. But, if you do things to create great content AND effectively tell the world about it, you can make it much more likely that the world will want to freely give a link to your site.
    In your example, how did the New York Times learn about the site? Clearly they are not going to let you come in and buy a link to your site. What you can do is the right things to make sure they know about it.

  3. Thanks for this great post. I got dinged by the penguin and had absolutely no idea why. Now I am wondering if it might be some of those “pingbacks” and other slightly spammy comments that I did not bother to zap. Going to check it out and see what I can do to preserve the rest of my PR and hopefully pump it back up. This article was very helpful.

  4. Sharon Vaz says:

    Is there some value in closing comments on one’s blog if the majority of them are spam? I closed them for a while but later re-opened as I was worried that Google would perceive the action as discouraging visitor interaction.

  5. Eric Enge says:

    Hi Sharon – I would not worry about closing comments. The other thing you could do it preview them all before they go live, an only publish the quality comments. Either way should be fine.

  6. Paul says:

    Ther are directories and directories – eg trade directories versus link dumps. I post Squidoo lenses on a directory maintained by another Squidoo writer – he keeps submission rates low and heavily encourages rating/viewing of other peiple’s lenses. Should I be concerned about such links?

  7. Eric Enge says:

    Hi Paul – it is hard to be sure without doing some analysis. The main thing you should ask yourself is why you are doing it. If it is because you know it might be counted as a good link to your site from Google, than the answer maybe that you should be concerned. If the work you are doing is something that you would absolutely have done even if there were no such thing as search engines, than is maybe that you don’t need to be concerned.

  8. Hi Eric
    I am fan of you instead :). I have checked lots of forums and news sites but still confused what is next. Link removal is OK. But what should we do next. With the optimization point of view site looks okay but should we now just wait for another update or we can go with off page submissions like Directories (obviously High PR) SBM. Articles and Press Release. Because this is what we are left to do after the Links are stopped. Do you think Link making will continue again?

  9. Eric Enge says:

    Press releases are OK, but won’t do a lot unless you have something big to announce. Guest posting to very high quality sites is OK. Stay away from the crappy blogs. If getting your guest post accepted is not hard, then you probably should not post on that blog. Focus on using methods that will help build a brand in the traditional sense, and you should be headed in the right direction.
    If you think about it, directories and article directories were not really brand building activities, they were just gaming the system. Shift your focus to areas of the web were people actually go and get visible there.
    Hope that helps!

  10. Akshara says:

    Indeed that’s awesome. But I was just thinking about the guest posts. The time is little different and everyone wants to earn money. What if guest posts are being sold out. I mean it is not going to be an easy task to get some one be make happy to post my article or information on his or her site. So if there is any demand of money then is there any chance Google may penalize me for getting those Guest posts links as well?

  11. Eric Enge says:

    If someone asks for money, just say no, and move on to the next blog. You are looking for the blogs that are looking for superior content (and you need to provide superior content). There are millions of them out there, for almost any topic matter. We do lots of this type of work, and find no shortage of blog owners who love getting very high quality content that is of value to their readers. Trust me, it works! Ans this if the type of guest blogging that is brand building in nature.

  12. Great post and interview.
    I have been woking on one of my clients that got google email, for more than 8 months now, because the bad links. The question he ask me almost every day is “are we there yet?
    I answer, why you hired any SEO to get so much spam links.
    As Mr. Clay said, Yes it is truth getting rid of bad links is twice harder than getting a good one.
    I think it is better to stop doing any Link Building until get rid of bad links, may not all but 90%, Eric, What do you think about it?

  13. Eric Enge says:

    Hi Rafael – I would advise that they focus on adding high quality links in parallel while removing the bad ones. For example, your client could work on doing some very high quality guest posts for very high quality sites, with an attribution link back to their site. Note that for this example, I would not advise putting links “in context” in the middle of the post, but simply in the author attribution.